Incorporation of novel meals in European diets can cut back world warming potential, water use and land use by over 80%
7 min readThe State of Meals and Agriculture (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/3/ca6030en/ca6030en.pdf
Campbell, B. M. et al. Agriculture manufacturing as a significant driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. 22, 8 (2017).
Crippa, M. et al. Meals techniques are chargeable for a 3rd of worldwide anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Meals 2, 198–209 (2021).
Double-Responsibility Actions for Vitamin: Coverage Temporary (World Well being Group, 2017).
Springmann, M. et al. Well being and dietary facets of sustainable food plan methods and their affiliation with environmental impacts: a worldwide modelling evaluation with country-level element. Lancet Planet. Well being 2, e451–e461 (2018).
Google Scholar
Clark, M. A., Springmann, M., Hill, J. & Tilman, D. A number of well being and environmental impacts of meals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23357–23362 (2019).
Google Scholar
Willett, W. et al. Meals within the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Fee on wholesome diets from sustainable meals techniques. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).
Parodi, A. et al. The potential of future meals for sustainable and wholesome diets. Nat. Maintain. 1, 782–789 (2018).
Google Scholar
Put up, M. J. et al. Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of cultured meat. Nat. Meals 1, 403–415 (2020).
Google Scholar
Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J. & Dagevos, H. A scientific assessment on client acceptance of different proteins: pulses, algae, bugs, plant-based meat alternate options, and cultured meat. Urge for food 159, 105058 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, B. F. et al. Nation-specific dietary shifts to mitigate local weather and water crises. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 101926 (2019).
Perignon, M. et al. How low can dietary greenhouse gasoline emissions be decreased with out impairing dietary adequacy, affordability and acceptability of the food plan? A modelling research to information sustainable meals selections. Public Well being Nutr. 19, 2662–2674 (2016).
Google Scholar
Springmann, M., Godfray, H. C. J., Rayner, M. & Scarborough, P. Evaluation and valuation of the well being and local weather change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4146–4151 (2016).
Google Scholar
Saxe, H., Larsen, T. M. & Mogensen, L. The worldwide warming potential of two wholesome Nordic diets in contrast with the common Danish food plan. Climatic Change 116, 249–262 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ulaszewska, M. M., Luzzani, G., Pignatelli, S. & Capri, E. Evaluation of diet-related GHG emissions utilizing the environmental hourglass method for the Mediterranean and new Nordic diets. Sci. Complete Environ. 574, 829–836 (2017).
Google Scholar
van Dooren, C., Marinussen, M., Blonk, H., Aiking, H. & Vellinga, P. Exploring dietary pointers primarily based on ecological and dietary values: a comparability of six dietary patterns. Meals Coverage 44, 36–46 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mertens, E. et al. Dietary selections and environmental impression in 4 European international locations. J. Clear. Prod. 237, 117827 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vieux, F., Perignon, M., Gazan, R. & Darmon, N. Dietary modifications wanted to enhance food plan sustainability: are they comparable throughout Europe? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 72, 951–960 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gazan, R. et al. Mathematical optimization to discover tomorrow’s sustainable diets: a story assessment. Adv. Nutr. 9, 602–616 (2018).
Google Scholar
Meier, T. & Christen, O. Environmental impacts of dietary suggestions and dietary types: Germany for example. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 877–888 (2013).
Google Scholar
van Kernebeek, H. R. J., Oosting, S. J., van Ittersum, M. Okay., Bikker, P. & de Boer, I. J. M. Saving land to feed a rising inhabitants: penalties for consumption of crop and livestock merchandise. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 677–687 (2016).
Gephart, J. A. et al. The environmental value of subsistence: optimizing diets to reduce footprints. Sci. Complete Environ. 553, 120–127 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wilson, N., Cleghorn, C. L., Cobiac, L. J., Mizdrak, A. & Nghiem, N. Attaining wholesome and sustainable diets: a assessment of the outcomes of latest mathematical optimization research. Adv. Nutr. 10, S389–S403 (2019).
Google Scholar
Röös, E. et al. Grasping or needy? Land use and local weather impacts of meals in 2050 beneath completely different livestock futures. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 1–12 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tyszler, M., Kramer, G. & Blonk, H. Simply consuming more healthy just isn’t sufficient: learning the environmental impression of various food plan eventualities for Dutch ladies (31–50 years previous) by linear programming. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 701–709 (2016).
Google Scholar
Thornton, P. Okay. Livestock manufacturing: latest tendencies, future prospects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2853–2867 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cobiac, L. J. & Scarborough, P. Modelling the well being co-benefits of sustainable diets within the UK, France, Finland, Italy and Sweden. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 624–633 (2019).
Google Scholar
Siegrist, M. & Hartmann, C. Perceived naturalness, disgust, belief and meals neophobia as predictors of cultured meat acceptance in ten international locations. Urge for food 155, 104814 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tzachor, A., Richards, C. E. & Holt, L. Future meals for risk-resilient diets. Nat. Meals 2, 326–329 (2021).
Bryant, C. & Barnett, J. Shopper acceptance of cultured meat: an up to date assessment (2018–2020). Appl. Sci. 10, 5201 (2020).
Gazan, R. et al. A technique to compile meals metrics associated to food plan sustainability right into a single meals database: utility to the French case. Meals Chem. 238, 125–133 (2018).
Google Scholar
O’Mahony, C. & Vilone, G. Compiled European meals consumption database. EFSA Assist. Publ. 10, 415E (2013).
The EFSA Complete European Meals Consumption Database—European Union Open Knowledge Portal v.2020 (EFSA, 2018); https://information.europa.eu/euodp/en/information/dataset/the-efsa-comprehensive-european-food-consumption-database
FoodData Central (USDA, 2018); https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/index.html
ISO 14040: Environmental Administration—Life Cycle Evaluation—Ideas and Framework (Worldwide Group for Standardization, 2006).
Guinee, J. B. et al. Life cycle evaluation: previous, current, and future. ACS Publ. 45, 90–96 (2011).
AGRIBALYSE 3.0: Agricultural and Meals Database for French Merchandise and Meals LCA v.2020 (French Company for Ecological Transition, 2020); https://simapro.com/merchandise/agribalyse-agricultural-database/
OpenLCA v.1.10.3 (GreenDelta, 2007)
LCIA: The ReCiPe Mannequin (Nationwide Institute for Public Well being and the Setting Netherlands, 2011); https://www.rivm.nl/en/life-cycle-assessment-lca/recipe
Boulay, A.-M. et al. The WULCA consensus characterization mannequin for water shortage footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption primarily based on obtainable water remaining (AWARE). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 368–378 (2018).
Google Scholar
Voutilainen, E., Pihlajaniemi, V. & Parviainen, T. Financial comparability of meals protein manufacturing with single-cell organisms from lignocellulose side-streams. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 14, 100683 (2021).
Järviö, N., Maljanen, N.-L., Kobayashi, Y., Ryynänen, T. & Tuomisto, H. L. An attributional life cycle evaluation of microbial protein manufacturing: a case research on utilizing hydrogen-oxidizing micro organism. Sci. Complete Environ. 776, 145764 (2021).
Smetana, S., Sandmann, M., Rohn, S., Pleissner, D. & Heinz, V. Autotrophic and heterotrophic microalgae and cyanobacteria cultivation for meals and feed: life cycle evaluation. Bioresour. Technol. 245, 162–170 (2017).
Google Scholar
Smetana, S., Schmitt, E. & Mathys, A. Sustainable use of Hermetia illucens insect biomass for feed and meals: attributional and consequential life cycle evaluation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 144, 285–296 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kobyashi, Y. & Tuomisto, H. L. Plant cell tradition life cycle evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. (within the press).
Järviö, N. et al. Ovalbumin manufacturing utilizing Trichoderma reesei tradition and low-carbon power may mitigate the environmental impacts of chicken-egg-derived ovalbumin. Nat. Meals 2, 1005–1013 (2021).
Tuomisto, H. L., Allan, S. J. & Ellis, M. J. Potential life cycle evaluation of a whole bioprocess design for aesthetic meat manufacturing in hole fiber bioreactor. Nat. Meals (within the press).
Comparative GHG Emissions Evaluation of Good Day Whey Protein Manufacturing to Dairy Protein (Good Day, 2021).
SimaPro v.9.1.1 (PRé Consultants, 2020).
Karlsson Potter, H., Lundmark, L. & Röös, E. Environmental Influence of Plant-Primarily based Meals – Knowledge Assortment for the Growth of a Shopper Information for Plant-Primarily based Meals (Swedish College of Agricultural Sciences, SLU, 2020); https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/17699/1/Report112.pdf
Jolliet, O. et al. IMPACT 2002: a brand new life cycle impression evaluation methodology. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8, 324–330 (2003).
Google Scholar
Yang, X. in From Linear Programming to Metaheuristics 67-78 (Cambridge Worldwide Science Publishing Ltd., 2008).
Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Vitamin Suggestions 2012: Integrating Vitamin and Bodily Exercise (Nordisk Ministerråd, 2014).
Protein and Amino Acid Necessities in Human Vitamin World Well being Group Technical Report Collection 1 (FAO/WHO, 2007).
European Meals Security Administration. Steerage on chosen default values for use by the EFSA Scientific Committee, Scientific Panels and Items within the absence of precise measured information. EFSA J. 10, 2579 (2012).
Siva Kiran, R. R., Madhu, G. M. & Satyanarayana, S. V. Spirulina in combating protein power malnutrition (PEM) and protein power losing (PEW)—a assessment. J. Nutr. Res. 3, 62–79 (2015).
Nordlund, E. et al. Plant cells as meals—an idea taking form. Meals Res. Int. 107, 297–305 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cherry, P., O’hara, C., Magee, P. J., Mcsorley, E. M. & Allsopp, P. J. Dangers and advantages of consuming edible seaweeds. Nutr. Rev. 77, 307–329 (2019).
Google Scholar
Elorinne, A.-L. et al. Meals and nutrient consumption and dietary standing of Finnish vegans and non-vegetarians. PLoS ONE 11, e0148235 (2016).
Google Scholar
Heijungs, R. On the variety of Monte Carlo runs in comparative probabilistic LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 25, 394–402 (2020).
Google Scholar
Henriksson, P. J. G., Zhang, W. & Guinée, J. B. Up to date unit course of information for coal-based power in China together with parameters for general dispersions. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 185–195 (2015).
Google Scholar
Karlsson, J. O., Carlsson, G., Lindberg, M., Sjunnestrand, T. & Röös, E. Designing a future meals imaginative and prescient for the Nordics by way of a participatory modeling method. Agron. Maintain. Dev. 38, pp.1–10 (2018).
Eustachio Colombo, P., Patterson, E., Lindroos, A. Okay., Parlesak, A. & Elinder, L. S. Sustainable and acceptable faculty meals by way of optimization evaluation: an intervention research. Nutr. J. 19, 1–15 (2020).
Google Scholar
